My first attempt at googling resulted in webpages filled with copies of the article required to read in class.

My second attempt yielded more detailed results about the lawsuit, and the Swarthmore students' victory against Diebold. The memos that Diebold tried to keep private were also posted on some webpages --specifically a swarthmore.edu webpage. A lot of the webpages gathered the more significant comments from the memos and quoted them to show that Diebold was covering up information important to voters. I didn't find any webpages that defended Diebold's position, only criticizing their abusive use of copy rights to protect themselves, most were celebrating Swarthmore's students' victory and their free speech rights.

Some important comments were that although Diebold had copyrights, money wasn't an issue, political speech was, and that's why they lost they lost the case.