March 28, 2005
spanking a child is not child abuse
1. What will be the topic of your definition argument? Explain.
Spanking a child is not child abuse.
2. Write a first-pass definition thesis that your paper will support. The claim must identify a choice of a specific case, a category and at least two or three preliminary criteria.
Abuse is X, and child abuse is Y, spanking a child is not X or Y, therefore, spanking a child is not child abuse.
3. Describe an audience that would find your claim interesting or controversial. Why would they care about your claim?
I think parents would like to know how the law describes child abuse, and if their discipline-style is within the limits of "abuse"
4. List some items that are obvious members of the category, some that are non-members, and some borderline cases.
Mika,
This is definitely a definitional argument. The most intricate aspect of it will be how you draw the line of where spanking ends and beating begins.
