March 28, 2005

By Mika

spanking a child is not child abuse

1. What will be the topic of your definition argument? Explain.

Spanking a child is not child abuse.


2. Write a first-pass definition thesis that your paper will support. The claim must identify a choice of a specific case, a category and at least two or three preliminary criteria.

Abuse is X, and child abuse is Y, spanking a child is not X or Y, therefore, spanking a child is not child abuse.

3. Describe an audience that would find your claim interesting or controversial. Why would they care about your claim?

I think parents would like to know how the law describes child abuse, and if their discipline-style is within the limits of "abuse"


4. List some items that are obvious members of the category, some that are non-members, and some borderline cases.

Comments

Mika,
This is definitely a definitional argument. The most intricate aspect of it will be how you draw the line of where spanking ends and beating begins.

Posted by Mariela Hristova on March 31, 2005 04:40 PM